about 'generative ai'.... i think we have reached a 'limit' of intelligence..
..if intelligence was restricted to 'words'...- we do have a 'standard' of that..
...and i guess we have seen - the impact of such - products..
i cant help to notice - people and even me : can make out ai from human
even if it is just - words.
if 1 takes 'tone' of words - selection of them..
...and consider - we have been doing - mostly useless stuff as 'progress/science'..
ai is a perfect 'tool' - to reduce human words, expression and hence precision of them.
the effect of this 'ease' : is most evident in 'education'..
as soon as 'easy' is gives to undeserving..
L0 - needs/wants : multiply beyond 'logic'
suddenly - the 'super intelligence ai' - becomes entitlement of all with less brain..
and we have mind = might scenarios - playing out in west.
for me - it is the data and stats..
needless to say - few big tech leetards think their 'superiority' is in block mine..
and dey got the biggest hive mind of google - on it for years.
but the traffic only grew.
somehow - we can still make out ai from human words.
which brings me back to my delusional 'observation'..
...something in 'us' - recognizes when it is 'ai' or 'human'...
and that is the bigger reasoning : which is the lesson of all this hype...
despite our nature - we still believe a human and his voice..
coz something 'quantum' : still happens between humans.
the mistakes are a marker - but even 'words' : have a quantum power to make demselves out from - artificial.
the broader example is - youtube.
the platform is promoting ai : by breaking existing men : content creators..
by de-monetizing, censorship and shadow ban..
but despite that - humans and their flawed words/ voice - is still 'liked'.
it is creating ai : and promoting it : by being a producer, consumer and 'money' of it all
an experiment in breaking human will - to ai, by ai, using 'trust' of google.
still - failing on it - despite being producer, promoted and 'free' provider for ai.
that is some practical of theory of humans.
we like each others' flaws - for 'perfect' is relative to us.
and ai 'perfection' is irritating and professional for us.