the way we are told to measure 'intelligence'..

the way we are told to measure 'intelligence'..
feels quite "brit levels"..
hear me out...maybe it makes sense.

i dont think those puzzle things : measure intelligence..
i think practice : makes them easy..
after a while : they are just patterns..

what happens : is training the brain to spot them
same is coding..
same is all the skills i can count...

i dont think counting 'tables' or being able to do those IIM kind things..
is intelligence..

i feel people are intelligent at skills..
and their intelligence : hard to dispute..
minutes of time : vs hours of debug : says it all..

to me, intelligence is shown at unknown..
being able to deploy your know : at any time

i think : thats the product of practice or general..
being able to handle 'fear'..

to be honest : i absolutely believe the entire education system and rewards of those jobs..fancy 1s..
are artificial, and dont really reflect aukaat of an individual..
they seem like a matrix of its own, a metaverse which seem like a 'win'...
but is rather like some quicksand, which doesnt feel like it..

unless 'money' or 'fired' show the real standing in life.

not trying to say i am 'intelligent'..

all i am trying to say

: we are intelligent for our 'purpose'.