there are limits of 'control' here..

there are limits of 'control' here..
no1 can guarantee
: a mail service wont be used for 'nefarious' purposes..
: a judge or govt : would be acting for 'nationalistic' purposes
: a user and his intents : change with 'time'

3 parties : who dont and cant trust each other..
and honestly : should not trust any1.

it is a technical problem..
any user : would want to know if his 'privacy' is being violated..
without any 'notice'...

and govt : are within their duties to provide a safe territory..
and judges : are part of that...

the problem : is pre-emptive decisions..

you use protonmail : must be using it for 'dicey' purposes..

protonmail = bad = u hiding bad things = u do bad things
=> prove it to thulla : that u aint doing bad things..
==> by opening the mailbox : and sharing the 'mailbox'

then the judge and thulla combo : decide if you are 'legal' or not.

this is seeking control : not solution.

a solution can be made : technically possible..
but it requires transparency and accountability from govt..
who do they 'hack/monitor' and for what purposes.

right now : its all 'hack/monitor' : u wont even know it..
and some 'unknown' thulla : judges you for it...
if he is able to make 'sense' out of it
: after few years of required muggary as iaps.
: same as judges : years on nepotistic muggary : to preserve the old collegium system

they dont want solutions : just control ever sheep.