I missed something

I missed something

this is quite important - it seems

Seems 'platonic' love needs labels in a religion.

i simply dont understand why?

It is quite binary - u dont bonk your ancestral object...

'assuming' leads to incestory++

It seems rudimentary....
and since it is april 1....

i do need to write it in 'word'

0s dont bonk your sis/bro/cousin etx 😃 (just to be clear!)

words are of paw - bitter and true...

intents are of CodeParity.

further thoughts...

ideas = minds bonking each other = a new idead object
kids = bodies bonking = a new 3d object

diversity - is needed in both realms.

It is quite 'proud' - the govt has to bring out laws - CAA etc to tell ppl they are not hamsters...
the popets are angry - this counts as 'religious freedom' for them - 9 year old 'adults' should be able to marry - choose gender and make lifelong commitments...

it took paw 42 years to learn ...
a kid at 9 years - can he really make lifelong choices? marriage and bonking?
i think no...
that age is more well spent discovering various flavors of ice cream and where to get them...

data: green objects and results...
it is not a corner case, when a 'religion' makes it 'good'

dawn.com/news/1212811

G - the whole company - baldies - global - everywhere...
are example of intellectual incest....
pichai papu - bonking ideas with 'desi alfreds' - the comfort and compliance of a culture - cukcoled into intellectual impotence/deformities of T$