The larger question in context of religion of CodeParity:

Can anyone be judged for a choice which 1 thinks is

'impossible > unsafe > safe > $$ > fame > pure > impure > restore > pure'??

ie if perceived fear is considered 'societal practice' than can anyone have any moral say on it?

abdul or alfred?
Karma - the psy op is there for a purpose - the purposes of baphomet.

further thoughts...

endless fear of choices - making or not making them is irrelevant...
grief, ??, time travel would be a hit with gVeronicas...
the travellers' algo gets complex with more todos...
u can imagine the logical state of it...and then the additional load of sigma gAmit++ - hats off.

the pure impure thing - is making a pivotal 'choice' and coming to terms with it...
it is just making 'peace/sense' of a choice and its future implications...
it is also an individual cycle..

clarify - karma exists - its quantification - religion, law - prophets police and judges - they can only try to quantify them...
and quantification is really $$ and its various forms ....

ahem - i think i need to clarify - unkle not 'fielding' for any gVeronica 🤣

many other unkles might - unkles++ inshahallah!
this-> nono 😂