Deciding what is "free speech"

Deciding what is "free speech"

Free speech can be harmful - eg this and most of the stuff i write

Harmful to whom?

Masters/Former Employers and their offsprings.

Europe adopted one - trustLab (former xooglers)

martechseries.com/content/trust-lab-chosen-by-the-european-commission-to-track-and-measure-extremist-and-violent-content-across-european-union-member-states/

while X or twatter seems "non free speech" to masters

theverge.com/2023/9/27/23892145/twitter-x-elon-musk-disinformation-european-union-commission-digital-services-act

the choice really is an illusion - of win or getting your voice heard by "choosing" between 2 baphomets.

Both are "nice" X/xBooglers - both are "free" to speech.....

further thoughts...

who pays ?? the taxes.
state priorities

1. nanny adults about "expression" (muzzle)
2. "confuse" the kids about "lgbtq+" at age 5 ( indocternation)
3. keep the financial whip alive (taxes, wars, vax, immigrants, religion etc)

...while gmos keep them healthy....

eu masters are just awesome.

Do you know ?

• Pron is allowed on twitter, insta and other social media websites - at age 13???

isnt that in contradiction with most national laws??

most govt keep shut about this "very apparent" conflict of domestic laws and "liberties" taken by brit/wef/big tech masters...

18 national vs 13 on twitter/x or insta etc...

are govt really doing their jobs???