call it being idealistic or non - sigma approach...
Engineering is, inherently - a creative field
-
not the muggary of copy paste
-
of following 'protocols'
-
of compliance with industry standards and UI/UX
A new - is new engineering...
that is a creative path..
a path - which cannot be quantified by 'time/$$'
the real strength
- to me, seems like 'believing' in it..
a test of 'belief'
a test of a 0.
automated import. If something looks out of place, check the orig linkedin post
After Thoughts
Thoth:#1
this pattern - running from corp sigmas/veronicas to end up in paws of a lalla $ baniya - did that quite a few times..
$financier - is just not $ in India - its fame too eg telecom baldie and his 'mahima' - all v transactional - in fame/visibility
a solution - which solves a problem - sells a box
it can be a gbox, orklie, zamazon - the customer couldnt care less.
comics - validate the aibox.
a solution - when 'sold' - offers no leverage to financiers, except become bank competition...
Thoth:#2
should also explain blah blah's journey from cto to sales engineer...
i wanted to learn this hidden/obscure art of bleah blah...
the wonder that is 'negotiations of genius' kinds
promise what sales peeps make
real ground reality - the anxiety of engineers
the 'struggle' of managers - dealing with sales peeps
it is simple - the sales peeps are genius by design - looks and sigmas - just the world and how it is - cio at the end of it
thats how 'engineering' lets down the sales peeps - the alphas, omegas and money bringers - the providers of a corp.
Thoth:#3
solutions sell - tech doesnt.
eg compare salaries and lives of nerds - phd iitx etx
and the sigmas and veronicas....
the same thing - which google cloud 'leader' - that shiny kerala soros industry cloud 'pioneer' mugged, but could not 'understand'.