I missed something
- the concept of 'brotherhood/sisterhood - Xhood etx'
this is quite important - it seems
Seems 'platonic' love needs labels in a religion.
i simply dont understand why?
It is quite binary - u dont bonk your ancestral object...
- seems quite small to even mention this...
..kinda expected it to be science, common sense, morality etx..
'assuming' leads to incestory++
-
pentidass, green objects, etx in material 3d world
-
exponential growth of 'thoths' of this 'pure' 'process'... eg baldies and papus in 'intellectual world'
It seems rudimentary....
and since it is april 1....
i do need to write it in 'word'
0s dont bonk your sis/bro/cousin etx 😃 (just to be clear!)
- in religion of codeparity
words are of paw - bitter and true...
intents are of CodeParity.
automated import. If something looks out of place, check the orig linkedin post
After Thoughts
Thoth:#1
data: green objects and results...
it is not a corner case, when a 'religion' makes it 'good'
Thoth:#2
It is quite 'proud' - the govt has to bring out laws - CAA etc to tell ppl they are not hamsters...
the popets are angry - this counts as 'religious freedom' for them - 9 year old 'adults' should be able to marry - choose gender and make lifelong commitments...
it took paw 42 years to learn ...
a kid at 9 years - can he really make lifelong choices? marriage and bonking?
i think no...
that age is more well spent discovering various flavors of ice cream and where to get them...
Thoth:#3
ideas = minds bonking each other = a new idead object
kids = bodies bonking = a new 3d object
diversity - is needed in both realms.